Angel Group Watch

Just another site


leave a comment »

January 20, 2003 Monday

Local Government Chronicle (LGC)

Thousands of asylum-seekers are to be housed in country mansions and former hotels being bought by property firms w… Thousands of asylum-seekers are to be housed in country mansions and former hotels being bought by property firms working for the Home Office, reported The Sunday Times (p1).Home secretary David Blunkett has commissioned 20 accomodation and property companies to find large buildings that have planning permission for use as hostels. The tactic avoids the need to consult local authorities or residents who might delay the government’s plans. The scheme has provoked outrage among people around the new centres.The first, whose sale to Accomodata, the Home Office contractor, will be agreed today, is the three-star Coniston Hotel in Sittingbourne, Kent. About 100 asylum-seekers will be housed there. A similar deal is being done in the village of Caythorpe in Lincolnshire. Caythorpe Lodge, a grade II listed hunting lodge, has been bought by the Angel Group, another contractor.The Home Office refused to reveal the cost of the scheme but confirmed that at least 10 centres were planned.The decision to target buildings that need no planning permission marks a sharp change in tactics by the government. Last year, ministers agreed a system where arrivals would spend two weeks in ‘induction centres’ before moving to ‘accomodation centres’. Those whose asylum claims were refused would be sent to one of six ‘removal centres’.Implementation has been slow, with attempts to open two of the first two accomodation centres – in Bicester, Oxfordshire, and at RAF Newton, near Nottingham – being rejected by local authority planning committees. The appeals are taking months.In contrast, in Sittingbourne the conversion from hotel to induction centre will take a week. As a hotel, the Coniston offered en suite facilities in all its 62 rooms, plus a restaurant.Derek Wyatt, Labour MP for Sittingbourne and Sheppey, described the plan as a ‘disgrace’. He added: ‘We are seeking a judicial review. There has been no consultation’.


Written by Concerned

January 20, 2003 at 11:38 am

Posted in Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: